[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <4E396F090200007800073F59@nat28.tlf.novell.com>
Date: Wed, 03 Aug 2011 15:53:44 +0100
From: "Jan Beulich" <jbeulich@...ell.com>
To: <daniel.stodden@...rix.com>, <Ian.Campbell@...citrix.com>,
<jaxboe@...ionio.com>, <annie.li@...cle.com>, <joe.jin@...cle.com>,
<konrad.wilk@...cle.com>, <KURT.HACKEL@...cle.com>
Cc: <xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com>, <greg.marsden@...cle.com>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0/3] xen-blkback: refactor vbd
remove/disconnect.
>>> Joe Jin 08/03/11 4:10 AM >>>
>1. start guest with the latest kernel.
>2. attach new block device by xm block-attach in Dom0
>3. mount new disk in guest
>4. execute xm block-detach to detach the block device in dom0 until timeout
>5. try to unmount the disk in guest, umount hung. at here, any IOs to the
>device will hang.
A bogus sequence of operations - an operator in Dom0 shouldn't remove
a device that is still in use in a guest, except as an exceptionasl measure
(and then other bad behavior is to be expected). What's the use case?
Jan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists