[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ADE657CA350FB648AAC2C43247A983F001F3882B8880@AUSP01VMBX24.collaborationhost.net>
Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2011 11:34:15 -0500
From: H Hartley Sweeten <hartleys@...ionengravers.com>
To: Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@...ana.be>
CC: Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Watchdog Mailing List <linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org>,
Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: RE: [RFC PATCH] watchdog: ep93xx: Use the WatchDog Timer Driver
Core.
On Wednesday, August 03, 2011 3:07 AM, Wim Van Sebroeck wrote:
> Hi H Hartley,
>
>>> [...]
>>>> @@ -210,43 +126,31 @@ static int __init ep93xx_wdt_init(void)
>>>> {
>>>> int err;
>>>>
>>>> - err = misc_register(&ep93xx_wdt_miscdev);
>>>> + ep93xx_wdd.bootstatus = readl(EP93XX_WDT_WATCHDOG);
>>>> + ep93xx_wdd.timeout = timeout;
>>>> +
>>>> + err = watchdog_register_device(&ep93xx_wdd);
>>>> + if (err)
>>>> + return err;
>>>>
>>>> - boot_status = __raw_readl(EP93XX_WDT_WATCHDOG) & 0x01 ? 1 : 0;
>>>> + setup_timer(&timer, ep93xx_timer_ping, 1);
>>>
>>> Shouldn't the bootstatus setting be:
>>> ep93xx_wdd.bootstatus = readl(EP93XX_WDT_WATCHDOG) & 0x01 ? 1 : 0;
>>> (or something similar with the WDIOF_OVERHEAT, ... flags).
>>
>> The ep93xx watchdog status register doesn't line up nicely with the standard
>> WDIOF_* flags. The register has these bits defined:
>>
>> PLSDN 6 Pulse Disable Not
>> OVRID 5 Software Override of HWDIS
>> SWDIS 4 Software Watchdog Disable
>> HWDIS 3 Hardware Watchdog Disable
>> URST 2 User Reset Detected
>> 3KRST 1 Three-Key Reset Detected
>> WD 0 Watchdog Reset Detected
>
> Hmm, it would be nice to have this info also in the driver. Certainly at
> least a define for the WD bit.
I was doing to document these bits in a follow-up patch after the conversion.
Instead I'll do it now in v2 of this patch. It does make the driver a bit clearer.
> Secondly: what it is doing now is allready incorrect: The WD bit is returned as
> bit 0 of the bootstatus value.
> This is actually: WDIOF_OVERHEAT (Reset due to CPU overheat) instead of
> WDIOF_CARDRESET (0x0020 Card previously reset the CPU)...
I agree, the current driver was already abusing the bootstatus use.
>> The original bootstatus setting just checked for the WD bit. I would like
>> to pass the full status register so that userspace can figure out what caused
>> the reset. Is this an inappropriate abuse of WDIOC_GETBOOTSTATUS?
>
> It's indeed an inappropriate abuse of WDIOC_GETBOOTSTATUS.
> The WDIOC_GETBOOTSTATUS should return a result for all watchdog drivers.
> The result is based on the WDIOF_* flags
> This however does not mean that we can add flags. The 'User Reset detected' looks
> to me as something that can be usefull in embedded environments. We need to think
> about this and see what would be usefull in general.
I'll post a v2 of this patch shortly and try to address this and your other comments.
Thanks,
Hartley
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists