linux-kernel - Re: + shm-fix-a-race-between-shm_exit-and-shm

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 3 Aug 2011 21:18:28 +0200
From:	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To:	Vasiliy Kulikov <segoon@...nwall.com>
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Manuel Lauss <manuel.lauss@...glemail.com>,
	Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: + shm-fix-a-race-between-shm_exit-and-shm_init.patch added to
	-mm tree

On 08/03, Vasiliy Kulikov wrote:
>
> On Wed, Aug 03, 2011 at 16:04 +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> >
> > And since we rely on .in_use == 0, why we can't move this check
> > outside of down_write/up_right to a) optimize the code and b)
> > fix the problem?
>
> Agreed.  But I second Linus that partial initialization only hides the
> real problem.  And some initcall chain movement is still needed.

I agree. But, until then, we can make a much more simple fix.
Especially because this patch (imho) mostly hides the problem too.

Oleg.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/