[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110803192930.GA320@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2011 21:29:30 +0200
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: Vasiliy Kulikov <segoon@...nwall.com>
Cc: Manuel Lauss <manuel.lauss@...glemail.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] shm: optimize exit_shm()
On 08/03, Vasiliy Kulikov wrote:
>
> On Wed, Aug 03, 2011 at 21:08 +0200, Manuel Lauss wrote:
> > > +
> > > /* Destroy all already created segments, but not mapped yet */
> > > down_write(&shm_ids(ns).rw_mutex);
> > > if (shm_ids(ns).in_use)
> >
> > This check here is now unnecessary, yes?
>
> No, as I said in the comment above, other task may be holding the mutex and
> deleting the last shm segment. So, current task will see in_use == 1
> before down_write(), but == 0 after it.
And? Why we can not do idr_for_each() in this (unikely) case?
> > And this also fixes the oops.
>
> Yes, but it only hides the real problem - tasks' dependency on initialized
> init_*_ns.
This is true, but your patch has the same dependency, but pretends
it doesn't ;) and it complicates the code.
Oleg.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists