[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110803202500.GA8286@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2011 22:25:00 +0200
From: Johannes Weiner <jweiner@...hat.com>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@...el.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@...il.com>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch 4/5] mm: writeback: throttle __GFP_WRITE on per-zone
dirty limits
On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 04:24:05PM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Mon 25-07-11 22:19:18, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> [...]
> > diff --git a/mm/page-writeback.c b/mm/page-writeback.c
> > index 41dc871..ce673ec 100644
> > --- a/mm/page-writeback.c
> > +++ b/mm/page-writeback.c
> > @@ -378,6 +390,24 @@ int bdi_set_max_ratio(struct backing_dev_info *bdi, unsigned max_ratio)
> > }
> > EXPORT_SYMBOL(bdi_set_max_ratio);
> >
> > +static void sanitize_dirty_limits(unsigned long *pbackground,
> > + unsigned long *pdirty)
> > +{
> > + unsigned long background = *pbackground;
> > + unsigned long dirty = *pdirty;
> > + struct task_struct *tsk;
> > +
> > + if (background >= dirty)
> > + background = dirty / 2;
> > + tsk = current;
> > + if (tsk->flags & PF_LESS_THROTTLE || rt_task(tsk)) {
> > + background += background / 4;
> > + dirty += dirty / 4;
> > + }
> > + *pbackground = background;
> > + *pdirty = dirty;
> > +}
> > +
> > /*
> > * global_dirty_limits - background-writeback and dirty-throttling thresholds
> > *
> > @@ -389,33 +419,52 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(bdi_set_max_ratio);
> > */
> > void global_dirty_limits(unsigned long *pbackground, unsigned long *pdirty)
> > {
> > - unsigned long background;
> > - unsigned long dirty;
> > unsigned long uninitialized_var(available_memory);
> > - struct task_struct *tsk;
> >
> > if (!vm_dirty_bytes || !dirty_background_bytes)
> > available_memory = determine_dirtyable_memory();
> >
> > if (vm_dirty_bytes)
> > - dirty = DIV_ROUND_UP(vm_dirty_bytes, PAGE_SIZE);
> > + *pdirty = DIV_ROUND_UP(vm_dirty_bytes, PAGE_SIZE);
> > else
> > - dirty = (vm_dirty_ratio * available_memory) / 100;
> > + *pdirty = vm_dirty_ratio * available_memory / 100;
> >
> > if (dirty_background_bytes)
> > - background = DIV_ROUND_UP(dirty_background_bytes, PAGE_SIZE);
> > + *pbackground = DIV_ROUND_UP(dirty_background_bytes, PAGE_SIZE);
> > else
> > - background = (dirty_background_ratio * available_memory) / 100;
> > + *pbackground = dirty_background_ratio * available_memory / 100;
> >
> > - if (background >= dirty)
> > - background = dirty / 2;
> > - tsk = current;
> > - if (tsk->flags & PF_LESS_THROTTLE || rt_task(tsk)) {
> > - background += background / 4;
> > - dirty += dirty / 4;
> > - }
> > - *pbackground = background;
> > - *pdirty = dirty;
> > + sanitize_dirty_limits(pbackground, pdirty);
> > +}
>
> Hmm, wouldn't be the patch little bit easier to read if this was
> outside in a separate (cleanup) one?
I didn't find it hard to read. But I wrote it, so... :)
Will split it out in the next round. Thanks, Michal.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists