[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LNX.2.01.1108031648510.21707@filesrv1.baby-dragons.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2011 16:51:03 -0800 (AKDT)
From: "Mr. James W. Laferriere" <babydr@...y-dragons.com>
To: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
cc: Linux Kernel Maillist <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: will someone make 2.6.39.* a longterm ?
Hello Greg ,
On Wed, 3 Aug 2011, Greg KH wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 03, 2011 at 12:05:58PM -0800, Mr. James W. Laferriere wrote:
>> Hello All , Is anyone looking at making 2.6.39.* into a longterm
>> stable ?
>
> No, why would they?
>
> Or, to turn it the other way, why do you feel .39 would be a viable
> longer kernel to maintain? What are you using it for that requires it
> to be handled in this manner?
> thanks,
> greg k-h
Probably no reason at all , But ... It is the final 2.6 kernel version .
With 3.0 being released there will only be Yours & the others
maintaining the 2.6.<39 otherwise .
Ego I guess .
Thank you for responding .
Twyl , JimL
--
+------------------------------------------------------------------+
| James W. Laferriere | System Techniques | Give me VMS |
| Network&System Engineer | 3237 Holden Road | Give me Linux |
| babydr@...y-dragons.com | Fairbanks, AK. 99709 | only on AXP |
+------------------------------------------------------------------+
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists