linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 16/23] sparc: Use HAVE_MEMBLOCK_NODE

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 04 Aug 2011 03:13:56 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	tj@...nel.org
Cc:	benh@...nel.crashing.org, yinghai@...nel.org, hpa@...or.com,
	tony.luck@...el.com, ralf@...ux-mips.org, schwidefsky@...ibm.com,
	liqin.chen@...plusct.com, lethal@...ux-sh.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
	mingo@...hat.com, sparclinux@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 16/23] sparc: Use HAVE_MEMBLOCK_NODE_MAP

From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Date: Thu, 4 Aug 2011 11:52:18 +0200

> On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 05:35:27PM +0200, Tejun Heo wrote:
>> sparc doesn't access early_node_map[] directly and enabling
>> HAVE_MEMBLOCK_NODE_MAP is trivial - replacing add_active_range() calls
>> with memblock_set_node() and selecting HAVE_MEMBLOCK_NODE_MAP is
>> enough.
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
>> Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
>> Cc: sparclinux@...r.kernel.org
> 
> David just confirmed this worked fine on sparc and was okay with this
> going through tip.

Yep:

Acked-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/