[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110804143733.GC18468@kroah.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Aug 2011 07:37:33 -0700
From: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
To: "MRU.Ilya" <utdilya@...l.ru>
Cc: stable@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: BUG: pty.c in linux 2.6.31-rc5+
On Thu, Aug 04, 2011 at 10:46:43AM +0400, MRU.Ilya wrote:
> Synchronic's line disciplines(ppp_synctty, hdlc) can't work with
> pseudo terminals.
>
> If frames send very fast from one side(master/slave) to other one,
> frames merge in one (merge point "flip buffer") and the other side
> can read only one big frame.
> But sync line discipline need one frame in one read.
>
> For push one frame to ldisc I propose small patch, but this regression for
> commit e043e42bdb66885b3ac10d27a01ccb9972e2b0a3.
>
> I don't find any mutexes and other things forbidden in not user context,
> in function flush_to_ldisc() , and I think this patch
> is true and this function can called from any context. But I not sure.
>
> Relative commit 86d23a057e718f73adc15e463c643d6e014a19cd.
>
>
> --- orig/pty.c 2011-07-13 07:29:43.000000000 +0400
> +++ work/pty.c 2011-08-03 20:59:01.000000000 +0400
> @@ -204,6 +204,7 @@
> clear_bit(TTY_OTHER_CLOSED, &tty->link->flags);
> set_bit(TTY_THROTTLED, &tty->flags);
> retval = 0;
> + tty->low_latency = 1;
I really don't think this is correct.
Also, you forgot to read Documentation/SubmittingPatches for how to
properly format and send a patch and who to send it to...
thanks,
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists