[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACxGe6uNK5KdXH2YFMyx1A+qcRGF-XHjZhhRZmk2KEq7hJo-og@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Aug 2011 17:58:42 +0100
From: Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>
To: Scott Wood <scottwood@...escale.com>
Cc: David Brown <davidb@...eaurora.org>,
devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] of/address: Add of_iomap_nocache
On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 5:56 PM, Scott Wood <scottwood@...escale.com> wrote:
>> +#ifndef SPARC
>> +extern void __iomem *of_iomap_nocache(struct device_node *device, int
>> index);
>> +#else
>> +static inline void __iomem *of_iomap_nocache(struct device_node *device,
>> + int index)
>> +{
>> + return of_iomap(device, index);
>> +}
>> +#endif
>
> Why is sparc special? It looks like it defines ioremap_nocache() as
> ioremap() just like powerpc and some others, so shouldn't the normal
> of_iomap_nocache just work?
No, the implementation is completely different. SPARC preparses all
the reg properties. Everyone else does not.
g.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists