[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4E3AD5E7.6040105@codeaurora.org>
Date: Thu, 04 Aug 2011 10:24:55 -0700
From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
To: David Brown <davidb@...eaurora.org>
CC: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-sh@...r.kernel.org,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@...prootsystems.com>,
Paul Mundt <lethal@...ux-sh.org>, x86@...nel.org,
Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpuidle: Consistent spelling of cpuidle_idle_call()
On 08/04/2011 09:24 AM, David Brown wrote:
> Commit a0bfa1373859e9d11dc92561a8667588803e42d8 mispells
> cpuidle_idle_call() on ARM and SH code. Fix this to be consistent.
>
> Cc: Kevin Hilman <khilman@...prootsystems.com>
> Cc: Paul Mundt <lethal@...ux-sh.org>
> Cc: x86@...nel.org
> Cc: Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>
> Signed-off-by: David Brown <davidb@...eaurora.org>
> ---
> The referenced commit breaks compilation on ARM, and appears it would
> do so on SH as well.
Mark Brown sent this patch[1] months ago when this build breakage was
noticed in linux-next. What happened to that patch? It looks like the
patch that introduced the breakage was pulled from linux-next shortly
after and then reintroduced today.
[1]https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/4/4/109
--
Sent by an employee of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists