[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110804223018.GA4370@dumpdata.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Aug 2011 18:30:18 -0400
From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>
To: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy.fitzhardinge@...rix.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
linux-next@...r.kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Re: linux-next: Tree for July 25 (xen)
> > > arch/x86/xen/trace.c:44:2: error: array index in initializer not of integer type
> > > arch/x86/xen/trace.c:44:2: error: (near initialization for ‘xen_hypercall_names’)
> > > arch/x86/xen/trace.c:45:1: error: ‘__HYPERVISOR_arch_4’ undeclared here (not in a function)
> > > arch/x86/xen/trace.c:45:2: error: array index in initializer not of integer type
> > > arch/x86/xen/trace.c:45:2: error: (near initialization for ‘xen_hypercall_names’)
> >
> > Oh, that I haven't seen. Can you send me the .config for that please.
>
> You can't be trying very hard then. I see lots of these (but no,
Hm, It is not obvious to me what is causing that compile failure. Any ideas?
> I haven't reported them. One can grow weary of reporting xen bugs.)
>
>
> > > even after:
> > >
> > > b3c4b9825075: xen/tracing: fix compile errors when tracing is disabled.
> > >
> > > Btw., that the heck is going on with the commit that introduced the
> > > build failure:
> > >
> > > commit bd9ddc875b6659f9f74dcfd285c472bc58041abd
> > > Author: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy.fitzhardinge@...rix.com>
> > > AuthorDate: Mon Jun 20 17:52:13 2011 -0700
> > > Commit: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy.fitzhardinge@...rix.com>
> > > CommitDate: Mon Jul 18 15:43:46 2011 -0700
> > >
> > > It was apparently rebased shortly before the merge window and sent to
> >
> > Well, the rebase I get - it was done on top of the merge that introduced
> > the new functionality.
> >
> > > Linus 3 days later, with little to no linux-next testing ...
> >
> > <Hmm> It did fix the compile problem.. albeit it created another one.
> > >
> > > I'm absolutely unhappy about how the Xen tree is being run. It's
> > > using a sloppy, crappy workflow and it is producing crap.
> >
> > Do you have a manual of how you guys run your workflow?
>
> I just run 30-50 randconfigs per night (cron job).
Ok, do you have an mailing list where you send the output too?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists