linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] devtmpfs: Fix section mismatch on devtmpfsd()

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 4 Aug 2011 15:54:18 -0700
From:	Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
To:	Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>
Cc:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] devtmpfs: Fix section mismatch on devtmpfsd()

On Thu, Aug 04, 2011 at 11:36:11PM +0100, Grant Likely wrote:
> devtmpfsd_init() references setup_done which is __initdata, but
> devtmpfsd() is not an __init function.  The code is fine, because it
> is never referenced after discarding __init sections, but it leaves
> some additional code that can be discarded with the rest of __init and
> it causes gcc to complain with a section mismatch warning.

I have a simpler patch here that just removes the __initdata function,
which is simpler.

I hate the initdata stuff, it's almost always pointless...

Would that solve the problem for you as well?

thanks,

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/