[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110804074700.GE21516@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Aug 2011 09:47:00 +0200
From: Johannes Weiner <jweiner@...hat.com>
To: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>
Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch] mm: thp: disable defrag for page faults per default
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 10:35:17AM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 10:38:41PM +0200, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> > With defrag mode enabled per default, huge page allocations pass
> > __GFP_WAIT and may drop compaction into sync-mode where they wait for
> > pages under writeback.
> >
> > I observe applications hang for several minutes(!) when they fault in
> > huge pages and compaction starts to wait on in-"flight" USB stick IO.
> >
> > This patch disables defrag mode for page fault allocations unless the
> > VMA is madvised explicitely. Khugepaged will continue to allocate
> > with __GFP_WAIT per default, but stalls are not a problem of
> > application responsiveness there.
> >
>
> Seems drastic. You could just avoid sync migration for transparent
> hugepage allocations with something like the patch below? There still
> is a stall as some order-0 pages will be reclaimed before compaction
> is tried again but it will nothing like a sync migration.
>
> === CUT HERE ===
> diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
> index 1fac154..40f2a9b 100644
> --- a/mm/page_alloc.c
> +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
> @@ -2174,7 +2174,14 @@ rebalance:
> sync_migration);
> if (page)
> goto got_pg;
> - sync_migration = true;
> +
> + /*
> + * Do not use sync migration for transparent hugepage allocations as
> + * it could stall writing back pages which is far worse than simply
> + * failing to promote a page.
> + */
> + if (!(gfp_mask & __GFP_NO_KSWAPD))
> + sync_migration = true;
For khugepaged it probably makes sense to enter sync migration. But
it's less important and could be fixed with an extra GFP flag later,
maybe?
> As this is USB, the rate of pages getting written back may mean that
> too much clean memory is reclaimed in direct reclaim while compaction
> still fails due to dirty pages. If this is the case, it can be mitigated
> with something like this before calling direct reclaim;
>
> if ((gfp_mask & __GFP_NO_KSWAPD) && compaction_deferred(preferred_zone))
> goto nopage;
Ah, that looks sensible.
Thanks, I'll add those hunks to my tree and see how they improve
behaviour and keep an eye on the THP statistics.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists