[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110805000148.GB13321@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Date: Fri, 5 Aug 2011 09:01:50 +0900
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
To: Stephen Warren <swarren@...dia.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Liam Girdwood <lrg@...com>,
Chris Ball <cjb@...top.org>, ccross@...roid.com,
olof@...om.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, alsa-devel@...a-project.org,
linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org, linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] irq: If an IRQ is a GPIO, request and configure it
On Thu, Aug 04, 2011 at 05:00:18PM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote:
> + } else {
> + gpio = irq_to_gpio(irq);
> + if (gpio_is_valid(gpio)) {
> + ret = gpio_request(gpio, new->name);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + goto out_mask;
> + ret = gpio_direction_input(gpio);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + goto out_mask;
> + }
If you treat failures as an error what happens when a driver is using a
GPIO as both an interrupt and a GPIO? For example a driver which
monitors the level on a GPIO and uses edge triggered IRQs to be notified
of state changes.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists