[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110805094319.GA2420@elte.hu>
Date: Fri, 5 Aug 2011 11:43:19 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>
Cc: Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>, Andrew Lutomirski <luto@....edu>,
x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] x86: Enable monitor/mwait on Intel if BIOS hasn't
already
* Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 04, 2011 at 05:54:04PM -0400, Len Brown wrote:
> > > We can't trust BIOS authors to get things right. Where we can reliably
> > > fix up things that are broken, we should do so.
> >
> > How about if we can get a BIOS fix for this brand new system,
> > then we shall not clutter the kernel with a workaround, otherwise
> > we shall.
>
> It's a pretty good rule of thumb that if a BIOS bug is present in
> one BIOS it's present in others, but the users will just never
> notice.
Yes. There's no harm really from working around a BIOS bug and
warning about it - when the BIOS gets fixed the warning message will
go away.
Btw., few people risk upgrading their BIOSen on already purchased
hardware. I almost never do it, i only do it if it's impossible to
continue with a current BIOS.
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists