[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4E3BFF9E.9060504@ispras.ru>
Date: Fri, 05 Aug 2011 18:35:10 +0400
From: Alexey Khoroshilov <khoroshilov@...ras.ru>
To: gregkh@...e.de
CC: wfp5p@...ginia.edu, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Staging: serqt_usb2: kmalloc(GFP_NOIO) with spinlock held in qt_break()
and qt_tiocmset()
qt_break() calls usb_control_msg() with spinlock held,
while usb_control_msg() calls kmalloc(GFP_NOIO) and indirectly usb_alloc_urb(GFP_NOIO).
The same is true for qt_tiocmget() and qt_tiocmset().
Is replacing spinlock with mutex an appropriate solution to fix the issue?
Found by Linux Driver Verification project (linuxtesting.org).
--
Alexey Khoroshilov
Linux Verification Center, ISPRAS
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists