[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110805023309.GA20447@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Aug 2011 22:33:09 -0400
From: Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>
To: Arnaud Lacombe <lacombar@...il.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
tom.l.nguyen@...el.com, yanmin.zhang@...el.com
Subject: Re: [rfc] suppress excessive AER output
On Thu, Aug 04, 2011 at 10:24:07PM -0400, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 6:34 PM, Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com> wrote:
> > I have a machine that has developed some kind of problem with
> > its onboard ethernet. It still boots, but spewed almost 1.5G of text
> > (2381585 instances of the warning below) before we realised what
> > was going on, and blacklisted the igb driver.
> >
> > Is it worth logging every single error when we're flooding like this ?
> > It seems unlikely that we'll find useful information in amongst that much data
> > that wasn't already in the first 100 instances.
> >
> > I picked 100 in the (untested) example patch below arbitarily, but the exact
> > value could be smaller, or slightly bigger..
> >
> > could we do something like this maybe ?
> >
> Please do not reinvent the wheel and use printk_ratelimited().
It's a different wheel.
printk_ratelimit slows down the output, but would still cause a lot of messages.
my diff turns it off completely after a threshold (apart from at the ulong wrap,
which I overlooked).
Dave
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists