linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH -v3.1 0/3] x86, AMD: Correct F15h IC aliasing issue

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20110805175522.GA26217@aftab>
Date:	Fri, 5 Aug 2011 19:55:22 +0200
From:	Borislav Petkov <bp@...64.org>
To:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>,
	"Przywara, Andre" <Andre.Przywara@....com>,
	"Pohlack, Martin" <Martin.Pohlack@....com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -v3.1 0/3] x86, AMD: Correct F15h IC aliasing issue

On Fri, Aug 05, 2011 at 01:10:29PM -0400, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> Patch 2 I'm going to object to because it puts your run_on_bsp method
> into a different structure where all the existing methods for this
> already are in a way that looks totally gratuitous to me.  Why not just
> have a c_bsp_init on struct cpu_dev like all the other methods?

Indeed, cpu_dev is actually the only logical place to put them, thanks.
I'm sending updated versions as a reply to this message.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.

Advanced Micro Devices GmbH
Einsteinring 24, 85609 Dornach
GM: Alberto Bozzo
Reg: Dornach, Landkreis Muenchen
HRB Nr. 43632 WEEE Registernr: 129 19551
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/