lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Fri, 05 Aug 2011 11:02:18 -0700
From:	Badari Pulavarty <pbadari@...ibm.com>
To:	Liu Yuan <namei.unix@...il.com>
CC:	Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@...il.com>,
	"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
	Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
	Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Khoa Huynh <khoa@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH]vhost-blk: In-kernel accelerator for virtio block
 device

On 8/5/2011 4:04 AM, Liu Yuan wrote:
> On 08/05/2011 05:58 AM, Badari Pulavarty wrote:
>> Hi Liu Yuan,
>>
>> I started testing your patches. I applied your kernel patch to 3.0
>> and applied QEMU to latest git.
>>
>> I passed 6 blockdevices from the host to guest (4 vcpu, 4GB RAM).
>> I ran simple "dd" read tests from the guest on all block devices
>> (with various blocksizes, iflag=direct).
>>
>> Unfortunately, system doesn't stay up. I immediately get into
>> panic on the host. I didn't get time to debug the problem. Wondering
>> if you have seen this issue before and/or you have new patchset
>> to try ?
>>
>> Let me know.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Badari
>>
>
> Okay, it is actually a bug pointed out by MST on the other thread, 
> that it needs a mutex for completion thread.
>
> Now would you please this attachment?This patch only applies to kernel 
> part, on top of v1 kernel patch.
>
> This patch mainly moves completion thread into vhost thread as a 
> function. As a result, both requests submitting and completion 
> signalling is in the same thread.
>
> Yuan

Unfortunately, "dd" tests (4 out of 6) in the guest hung. I see 
following messages

virtio_blk virtio2: requests: id 0 is not a head !
virtio_blk virtio3: requests: id 1 is not a head !
virtio_blk virtio5: requests: id 1 is not a head !
virtio_blk virtio1: requests: id 1 is not a head !

I still see host panics. I will collect the host panic and see if its 
still same or not.

Thanks,
Badari


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ