[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4E3C571C.1070903@zytor.com>
Date: Fri, 05 Aug 2011 13:48:28 -0700
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Andrew Lutomirski <luto@....edu>
CC: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, x86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
lueckintel@...oo.com, kimwooyoung@...il.com
Subject: Re: New vsyscall emulation breaks JITs
On 08/05/2011 01:45 PM, Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
>
> hpa: time is supported (as of 3.0) by the vdso, and very new glibc
> uses the vdso version. We could add a native time implementation back
> to the vsyscall page without too much pain as a short-term fix, but
> that would be less than ideal.
>
How new does glibc have to be?
How much of a pain would it be to make the legacy vs emulated vsyscall
page a config option?
-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists