linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH -next] drivers/base/inode.c: let vmstat

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 05 Aug 2011 16:02:58 +0800
From:	Cong Wang <amwang@...hat.com>
To:	Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>
CC:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>, gregkh@...e.de,
	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-mm@...ck.org, akpm <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] drivers/base/inode.c: let vmstat_text be optional

于 2011年08月05日 13:43, Randy Dunlap 写道:
> On 08/04/11 19:38, Cong Wang wrote:
>> 于 2011年08月05日 06:22, Randy Dunlap 写道:
>>> From: Randy Dunlap<rdunlap@...otime.net>
>>>
>>> vmstat_text is only available when PROC_FS or SYSFS is enabled.
>>> This causes build errors in drivers/base/node.c when they are
>>> both disabled:
>>>
>>> drivers/built-in.o: In function `node_read_vmstat':
>>> node.c:(.text+0x10e28f): undefined reference to `vmstat_text'
>>>
>>> Rather than litter drivers/base/node.c with #ifdef/#endif around
>>> the affected lines of code, add macros for optional sysdev
>>> attributes so that those lines of code will be ignored, without
>>> using #ifdef/#endif in the .c file(s).  I.e., the ifdeffery
>>> is done only in a header file with sysdev_create_file_optional()
>>> and sysdev_remove_file_optional().
>>>
>>
>> This looks ugly for me, because other sysfs files here are not optional
>> only due to that they don't rely on vmstat_text.
>>
>> I still think my approach to fix this is better, that is, introducing
>> a new Kconfig for drivers/base/node.c which depends on CONFIG_SYSFS.
>
> Did you post a patch for that?  I must have missed it.

Yes, see https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/7/19/31.

I think I need to resend it. :)

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/