[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110806015815.GA26833@dumpdata.com>
Date: Fri, 5 Aug 2011 21:58:16 -0400
From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy.fitzhardinge@...rix.com>,
linux-next@...r.kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Re: linux-next: Tree for July 25 (xen)
On Fri, Aug 05, 2011 at 11:14:23PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> wrote:
>
> > * Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net> wrote:
> >
> > > On 08/04/11 15:40, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Aug 04, 2011 at 06:32:59PM -0400, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> > > >>>>> These build failures are still triggering upstream:
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> arch/x86/xen/trace.c:44:2: error: array index in initializer not of integer type
> > > >>>>> arch/x86/xen/trace.c:44:2: error: (near initialization for ‘xen_hypercall_names’)
> > > >>>>> arch/x86/xen/trace.c:45:1: error: ‘__HYPERVISOR_arch_4’ undeclared here (not in a function)
> > > >>>>> arch/x86/xen/trace.c:45:2: error: array index in initializer not of integer type
> > > >>>>> arch/x86/xen/trace.c:45:2: error: (near initialization for ‘xen_hypercall_names’)
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> Oh, that I haven't seen. Can you send me the .config for that please.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> You can't be trying very hard then. I see lots of these (but no,
> > > >>
> > > >> Ah, I am getting it now. Thanks for reporting it.
> > > >
> > > > This should do the trick:
> > >
> > > Acked-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>
> >
> > That patch did the trick here too:
> >
> > Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
>
> Except that i'm still seeing the occasional build failure - see the
> error log below. Config attached.
Much appreciate for the report. I believe this fix (which I think hit
linux-next yesterday?) should do that:
commit 1e9ea2656b656edd3c8de98675bbc0340211b5bd
Author: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
Date: Wed Aug 3 09:43:44 2011 -0700
xen/tracing: it looks like we wanted CONFIG_FTRACE
Apparently we wanted CONFIG_FTRACE rather the CONFIG_FUNCTION_TRACER.
Reported-by: Sander Eikelenboom <linux@...elenboom.it>
Tested-by: Sander Eikelenboom <linux@...elenboom.it>
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy.fitzhardinge@...rix.com>
Signed-off-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>
diff --git a/arch/x86/xen/Makefile b/arch/x86/xen/Makefile
index 45e94ac..3326204 100644
--- a/arch/x86/xen/Makefile
+++ b/arch/x86/xen/Makefile
@@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ obj-y := enlighten.o setup.o multicalls.o mmu.o irq.o \
grant-table.o suspend.o platform-pci-unplug.o \
p2m.o
-obj-$(CONFIG_FUNCTION_TRACER) += trace.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_FTRACE) += trace.o
obj-$(CONFIG_SMP) += smp.o
obj-$(CONFIG_PARAVIRT_SPINLOCKS)+= spinlock.o
Planning to send all of the bug-fixes in my branch to Linus tomorrow - just
leaving it in linux-next for the full 24-hrs at least to make sure nothing
else goes haywire.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists