lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Sun, 7 Aug 2011 17:47:19 +0100 From: Tony Ibbs <tibs@...yibbs.co.uk> To: Tony Ibbs <tibs@...yibbs.co.uk> Cc: Colin Walters <walters@...bum.org>, lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, Florian Fainelli <florian@...nwrt.org>, Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>, Linux-embedded <linux-embedded@...r.kernel.org>, Tibs at Kynesim <tibs@...esim.co.uk>, Richard Watts <rrw@...esim.co.uk> Subject: Re: RFC: [Restatement] KBUS messaging subsystem On 3 Aug 2011, at 21:14, Tony Ibbs wrote: > On 29 Jul 2011, at 00:58, Colin Walters wrote: > >> You don't mention what your performance requirements are >> (if any) for example. > > We don't particularly have any... My colleague says that he has previously done measurements that show KBUS to be about 3 times slower than using shared memory and futexes, but (of course) much simpler to use. His implication is, I believe, that this is a respectable speed. Tibs -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists