[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Mon, 8 Aug 2011 20:20:33 +0400
From: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc: Nathan Lynch <ntl@...ox.com>, Oren Laadan <orenl@...columbia.edu>,
Daniel Lezcano <dlezcano@...ibm.com>,
Serge Hallyn <serue@...ibm.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Glauber Costa <glommer@...allels.com>,
containers@...ts.osdl.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...allels.com>,
Serge Hallyn <serge.hallyn@...onical.com>
Subject: Re: [patch 1/4] proc: Introduce the /proc/<pid>/mfd/ directory
On Mon, Aug 08, 2011 at 05:48:42PM +0200, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Maybe cc'ing linux-mm is a good idea for this one?
Yup!
...
> >
> > This thing is aimed to help checkpointing processes.
>
> I generally agree this is a good idea. Can you please add how it
> would look (say, example ls -l output) in the patch description?
> Maybe some people think using both start and end addresses for symlink
> name is better?
OK, will do in update.
>
> Another nit: I find the 'mfd' name a bit confusing as there's no file
> descriptor involved at all. Maybe map_files (as we already have maps)
> or something like that?
map_files looks good to me.
>
> > +static int proc_mfd_get_link(struct inode *inode, struct path *path)
> ...
> > + down_read(&mm->mmap_sem);
> > + for (vma = mm->mmap; vma; vma = vma->vm_next) {
> > + if (vma->vm_start < vm_start)
> > + continue;
> > + if (vma->vm_start > vm_start)
> > + break;
>
> Why do linear walk instead of find_vma()?
I suppose we simply missed this helper :/
>
> > +static const struct dentry_operations tid_mfd_dentry_operations = {
> > + .d_delete = pid_delete_dentry,
> > +};
>
> Don't we also need revalidation here like tid_fd_dentry_operations?
Stricktly speaking, yes. Since in previous patchset this entries was
used in helper tool _only_ when task is frozen it was not needed but
to fit run-time requirements I think we need d_revalidate here indeed.
Thanks!
> Also, I think it would be better if all the related functions are
> collected into one contiguous chunk. The scattering doesn't seem to
> make much sense.
ok
>
> > +static struct dentry *proc_mfd_lookup(struct inode *dir,
> > + struct dentry *dentry, struct nameidata *nd)
> > +{
> ..
> > + down_read(&mm->mmap_sem);
> > + for (vma = mm->mmap; vma; vma = vma->vm_next) {
> > + if (vma->vm_start == vm_start)
> > + break;
> > + if (vma->vm_start > vm_start)
> > + goto out_no_vma;
> > + }
>
> Ditto, no reason to do linear walk.
ok
>
> Thanks.
>
Thanks for comments, Tejun!
Cyrill
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists