[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Mon, 08 Aug 2011 17:39:36 +0100
From: Liam Girdwood <lrg@...nel.org>
To: Marcus Folkesson <marcus.folkesson@...il.com>
Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
Liam Girdwood <lrg@...com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] regulator: tps65023: patch updates
On Thu, 2011-08-04 at 13:33 +0200, Marcus Folkesson wrote:
> I'm currently fighting with my email-client (Mark, sorry for the draft just sent), but this should be proper in both formatting and email-list.
>
>
> Changes from previous patches:
> * Split up [PATCH 1/3] into two seperate patches ([PATCH [1-2]/4])
> * Declared tps_driver_data.info as const for avoiding awkward typecastings
> * Removed table-length structs and uses tps->table_len instead. (As Axel Lin suggested in lkml)
>
I've applied patch 1. 3 & 4 don't apply against -next.
Can you resend and add Mark's Acks to the relevant patches.
Thanks
Liam
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists