[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Mon, 8 Aug 2011 20:19:10 +0200
From: Per Forlin <per.forlin@...aro.org>
To: Akinobu Mita <akinobu.mita@...il.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>,
Matt Mackall <mpm@...enic.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -mmotm 1/2] fault-injection: improve naming of public
function should_fail()
On 8 August 2011 18:16, Akinobu Mita <akinobu.mita@...il.com> wrote:
> 2011/8/1 Per Forlin <per.forlin@...aro.org>:
>> rename fault injection function should_fail() to fault_should_fail()
>
> fault_should_fail sounds tautological.
> fault_should_inject() is better, but I'm not sure.
> Should we retain the naming issue and go forward to merge mmc fault
> injection first?
>
Fine with me.
I'll go ahead and prepare the mmc failt-injection patches based on
current naming.
Thanks,
Per
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists