linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 10/11] VFS: Cache request_queue in struct block

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 08 Aug 2011 14:22:56 -0400
From:	Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@...hat.com>
To:	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
	hch@...radead.org, Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
	jaxboe@...ionio.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/11] VFS: Cache request_queue in struct block_device


CC'd Jens.

Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org> writes:

> From: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
>
> This makes it possible to get from the inode to the request_queue
> with one less cache miss. Used in followon optimization.
>
> The livetime of the pointer is the same as the gendisk.
>
> This assumes that the queue will always stay the same in the
> gendisk while it's visible to block_devices. I think that's safe correct?
>
> Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
> ---
>  fs/block_dev.c     |    3 +++
>  include/linux/fs.h |    2 ++
>  2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/block_dev.c b/fs/block_dev.c
> index f55aad4..5e07536 100644
> --- a/fs/block_dev.c
> +++ b/fs/block_dev.c
> @@ -1110,6 +1110,7 @@ static int __blkdev_get(struct block_device *bdev, fmode_t mode, int for_part)
>  	mutex_lock_nested(&bdev->bd_mutex, for_part);
>  	if (!bdev->bd_openers) {
>  		bdev->bd_disk = disk;
> +		bdev->bd_queue = disk->queue;
>  		bdev->bd_contains = bdev;
>  		if (!partno) {
>  			struct backing_dev_info *bdi;
> @@ -1130,6 +1131,7 @@ static int __blkdev_get(struct block_device *bdev, fmode_t mode, int for_part)
>  					disk_put_part(bdev->bd_part);
>  					bdev->bd_part = NULL;
>  					bdev->bd_disk = NULL;
> +					bdev->bd_queue = NULL;
>  					mutex_unlock(&bdev->bd_mutex);
>  					disk_unblock_events(disk);
>  					module_put(disk->fops->owner);
> @@ -1203,6 +1205,7 @@ static int __blkdev_get(struct block_device *bdev, fmode_t mode, int for_part)
>  	disk_put_part(bdev->bd_part);
>  	bdev->bd_disk = NULL;
>  	bdev->bd_part = NULL;
> +	bdev->bd_queue = NULL;
>  	bdev_inode_switch_bdi(bdev->bd_inode, &default_backing_dev_info);
>  	if (bdev != bdev->bd_contains)
>  		__blkdev_put(bdev->bd_contains, mode, 1);
> diff --git a/include/linux/fs.h b/include/linux/fs.h
> index f23bcb7..ea5cb4d 100644
> --- a/include/linux/fs.h
> +++ b/include/linux/fs.h
> @@ -657,6 +657,7 @@ struct address_space {
>  	 * must be enforced here for CRIS, to let the least significant bit
>  	 * of struct page's "mapping" pointer be used for PAGE_MAPPING_ANON.
>  	 */
> +struct request_queue;
>  
>  struct block_device {
>  	dev_t			bd_dev;  /* not a kdev_t - it's a search key */
> @@ -679,6 +680,7 @@ struct block_device {
>  	unsigned		bd_part_count;
>  	int			bd_invalidated;
>  	struct gendisk *	bd_disk;
> +	struct request_queue *  bd_queue;
>  	struct list_head	bd_list;
>  	/*
>  	 * Private data.  You must have bd_claim'ed the block_device
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/