linux-kernel - Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/4] drm/i915: Leave LVDS registers unlocked

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <yunwrenu5f7.fsf@aiko.keithp.com>
Date:	Mon, 08 Aug 2011 11:25:16 -0700
From:	Keith Packard <keithp@...thp.com>
To:	Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>
Cc:	Dave Airlie <airlied@...hat.com>, intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/4] drm/i915: Leave LVDS registers unlocked

On Mon, 8 Aug 2011 09:30:10 -0700, Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org> wrote:

> Yep, looks fine.  The only think we might want to sprinkle about are
> checks for panel off so we can avoid visible corruption if we whack
> timing or fb stuff while the panel is on.

Yeah, could do. Would be nice to somehow get the LVDS code ripped out of
the middle of intel_display.c; everything in intel_lvds.c is nicely
bracketed by prepare/commit, which turn the panel off and back on.

-- 
keith.packard@...el.com

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped