[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Mon, 08 Aug 2011 12:12:46 -0700
From: "Nicholas A. Bellinger" <nab@...ux-iscsi.org>
To: Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
Cc: agrover@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
target-devel <target-devel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: drivers/target/target_core_transport.c breakage on i386
On Mon, 2011-08-08 at 01:10 +0100, Al Viro wrote:
> In commit ec98f7825c6eaa4a9afb0eb518826efc8a2ed4a2
> Author: Andy Grover <agrover@...hat.com>
> Date: Wed Jul 20 19:28:46 2011 +0000
>
> target: Eliminate usage of struct se_mem
>
> we got
> + task_count = DIV_ROUND_UP(sectors, dev_max_sectors);
> and that's sector_t/sector_t. 64bit division on i386 is no-no in
> the kernel - it emits __udivdi3 call and it's not there. Can
> sectors really reach 2^32 here?
>
Hi Al,
Just a heads up that this was caught this before -rc1, and we ended up
adding DIV_ROUND_UP_ULL using do_div() for the 32-bit case here, and
another DIV_ROUND_UP_SECTOR_T macro that target_core_transport.c is now
using to address this for i386.
kernel.h: Add DIV_ROUND_UP_ULL and DIV_ROUND_UP_SECTOR_T macro usage
http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commitdiff_plain;h=36a26c69b4c70396ef569c3452690fba0c1dec08
Thanks,
--nab
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists