lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Tue, 9 Aug 2011 11:44:43 +0200
From:	Olaf Hering <olaf@...fle.de>
To:	Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@...rix.com>
Cc:	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>,
	Konrad <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
	"xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com" <xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 3/3] xen/pv-on-hvm kexec+kdump: reset PV
 devices in kexec or crash kernel

On Tue, Aug 09, Ian Campbell wrote:

> >  static int frontend_probe_and_watch(struct notifier_block *notifier,
> >  				   unsigned long event,
> >  				   void *data)
> >  {
> > +	/* reset devices in Connected or Closed state */
> > +	if (xen_hvm_domain())
>                                && reset_devices ??

No, reset_devices is passed as kernel cmdline option to a kdump boot.
But its not part of a kexec boot.

> How long should we wait for the backend to respond? Should we add a
> timeout and countdown similar to wait_for_devices?

Adding a timeout to catch a confused backend is a good idea. That would
give one at least a chance to poke around in a rescue shell.

> It's unfortunate that this code is effectively serialising on each
> device. It would be much preferable to kick off all the resets and then
> wait for them to occur. You could probably do this by incrementing a
> counter for each device you reset and decrementing it each time a watch
> triggers then wait for the counter to hit zero.

That feature needs more thought. Since xenbus_reset_state() is only
executed in the kexec/kdump case, the average use case is not slowed
down.

Olaf
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ