| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <20110809191100.6c4c3285.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Aug 2011 19:11:00 +0900
From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
To: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
Cc: "linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"akpm@...ux-foundation.org" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>,
"hannes@...xchg.org" <hannes@...xchg.org>,
"nishimura@....nes.nec.co.jp" <nishimura@....nes.nec.co.jp>
Subject: [PATCH v5 4/6] memg: calculate numa weight for vmscan
caclculate node scan weight.
Now, memory cgroup selects a scan target node in round-robin.
It's not very good...there is not scheduling based on page usages.
This patch is for calculating each node's weight for scanning.
If weight of a node is high, the node is worth to be scanned.
The weight is now calucauted on following concept.
- make use of swappiness.
- If inactive-file is enough, ignore active-file
- If file is enough (w.r.t swappiness), ignore anon
- make use of recent_scan/rotated reclaim stats.
Then, a node contains many inactive file pages will be a 1st victim.
Node selection logic based on this weight will be in the next patch.
Signed-off-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
---
mm/memcontrol.c | 110 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
1 file changed, 105 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
Index: mmotm-Aug3/mm/memcontrol.c
===================================================================
--- mmotm-Aug3.orig/mm/memcontrol.c
+++ mmotm-Aug3/mm/memcontrol.c
@@ -144,6 +144,7 @@ struct mem_cgroup_per_zone {
struct mem_cgroup_per_node {
struct mem_cgroup_per_zone zoneinfo[MAX_NR_ZONES];
+ unsigned long weight;
};
struct mem_cgroup_lru_info {
@@ -286,6 +287,7 @@ struct mem_cgroup {
atomic_t numainfo_events;
atomic_t numainfo_updating;
struct work_struct numainfo_update_work;
+ unsigned long total_weight;
#endif
/*
* Should the accounting and control be hierarchical, per subtree?
@@ -1568,18 +1570,108 @@ static bool test_mem_cgroup_node_reclaim
}
#if MAX_NUMNODES > 1
+static unsigned long
+__mem_cgroup_calc_numascan_weight(struct mem_cgroup * memcg,
+ int nid,
+ unsigned long anon_prio,
+ unsigned long file_prio,
+ int lru_mask)
+{
+ u64 file, anon;
+ unsigned long weight, mask;
+ unsigned long rotated[2], scanned[2];
+ int zid;
+
+ scanned[0] = 0;
+ scanned[1] = 0;
+ rotated[0] = 0;
+ rotated[1] = 0;
+
+ for (zid = 0; zid < MAX_NR_ZONES; zid++) {
+ struct mem_cgroup_per_zone *mz;
+
+ mz = mem_cgroup_zoneinfo(memcg, nid, zid);
+ scanned[0] += mz->reclaim_stat.recent_scanned[0];
+ scanned[1] += mz->reclaim_stat.recent_scanned[1];
+ rotated[0] += mz->reclaim_stat.recent_rotated[0];
+ rotated[1] += mz->reclaim_stat.recent_rotated[1];
+ }
+ file = mem_cgroup_node_nr_lru_pages(memcg, nid, lru_mask & LRU_ALL_FILE);
+
+ if (total_swap_pages)
+ anon = mem_cgroup_node_nr_lru_pages(memcg,
+ nid, mask & LRU_ALL_ANON);
+ else
+ anon = 0;
+ if (!(file + anon))
+ node_clear(nid, memcg->scan_nodes);
+
+ /* 'scanned - rotated/scanned' means ratio of finding not active. */
+ anon = anon * (scanned[0] - rotated[0]) / (scanned[0] + 1);
+ file = file * (scanned[1] - rotated[1]) / (scanned[1] + 1);
+
+ weight = (anon * anon_prio + file * file_prio) / 200;
+ return weight;
+}
+
+/*
+ * Calculate each NUMA node's scan weight. scan weight is determined by
+ * amount of pages and recent scan ratio, swappiness.
+ */
+static unsigned long
+mem_cgroup_calc_numascan_weight(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
+{
+ unsigned long weight, total_weight;
+ u64 anon_prio, file_prio, nr_anon, nr_file;
+ int lru_mask;
+ int nid;
+
+ anon_prio = mem_cgroup_swappiness(memcg) + 1;
+ file_prio = 200 - anon_prio + 1;
+
+ lru_mask = BIT(LRU_INACTIVE_FILE);
+ if (mem_cgroup_inactive_file_is_low(memcg))
+ lru_mask |= BIT(LRU_ACTIVE_FILE);
+ /*
+ * In vmscan.c, we'll scan anonymous pages with regard to memcg/zone's
+ * amounts of file/anon pages and swappiness and reclaim_stat. Here,
+ * we try to find good node to be scanned. If the memcg contains enough
+ * file caches, we'll ignore anon's weight.
+ * (Note) scanning anon-only node tends to be waste of time.
+ */
+
+ nr_file = mem_cgroup_nr_lru_pages(memcg, LRU_ALL_FILE);
+ nr_anon = mem_cgroup_nr_lru_pages(memcg, LRU_ALL_ANON);
+
+ /* If file cache is small w.r.t swappiness, check anon page's weight */
+ if (nr_file * file_prio >= nr_anon * anon_prio)
+ lru_mask |= BIT(LRU_INACTIVE_ANON);
+
+ total_weight = 0;
+
+ for_each_node_state(nid, N_HIGH_MEMORY) {
+ weight = __mem_cgroup_calc_numascan_weight(memcg,
+ nid, anon_prio, file_prio, lru_mask);
+ memcg->info.nodeinfo[nid]->weight = weight;
+ total_weight += weight;
+ }
+
+ return total_weight;
+}
+
+/*
+ * Update all node's scan weight in background.
+ */
static void mem_cgroup_numainfo_update_work(struct work_struct *work)
{
struct mem_cgroup *memcg;
- int nid;
memcg = container_of(work, struct mem_cgroup, numainfo_update_work);
memcg->scan_nodes = node_states[N_HIGH_MEMORY];
- for_each_node_mask(nid, node_states[N_HIGH_MEMORY]) {
- if (!test_mem_cgroup_node_reclaimable(memcg, nid, false))
- node_clear(nid, memcg->scan_nodes);
- }
+
+ memcg->total_weight = mem_cgroup_calc_numascan_weight(memcg);
+
atomic_set(&memcg->numainfo_updating, 0);
css_put(&memcg->css);
}
@@ -4277,6 +4369,14 @@ static int mem_control_numa_stat_show(st
seq_printf(m, " N%d=%lu", nid, node_nr);
}
seq_putc(m, '\n');
+
+ seq_printf(m, "scan_weight=%lu", mem_cont->total_weight);
+ for_each_node_state(nid, N_HIGH_MEMORY) {
+ unsigned long weight;
+ weight = mem_cont->info.nodeinfo[nid]->weight;
+ seq_printf(m, " N%d=%lu", nid, weight);
+ }
+ seq_putc(m, '\n');
return 0;
}
#endif /* CONFIG_NUMA */
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists