lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Tue, 9 Aug 2011 12:26:34 +0100
From:	Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@...citrix.com>
To:	Olaf Hering <olaf@...fle.de>
CC:	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"Jeremy Fitzhardinge" <jeremy@...p.org>,
	Konrad <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
	"xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com" <xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 3/3] xen/pv-on-hvm kexec+kdump: reset PV
 devices in kexec or crash kernel

On Tue, 2011-08-09 at 10:44 +0100, Olaf Hering wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 09, Ian Campbell wrote:
> 
> > >  static int frontend_probe_and_watch(struct notifier_block *notifier,
> > >  				   unsigned long event,
> > >  				   void *data)
> > >  {
> > > +	/* reset devices in Connected or Closed state */
> > > +	if (xen_hvm_domain())
> >                                && reset_devices ??
> 
> No, reset_devices is passed as kernel cmdline option to a kdump boot.
> But its not part of a kexec boot.
> 
> > How long should we wait for the backend to respond? Should we add a
> > timeout and countdown similar to wait_for_devices?
> 
> Adding a timeout to catch a confused backend is a good idea. That would
> give one at least a chance to poke around in a rescue shell.
> 
> > It's unfortunate that this code is effectively serialising on each
> > device. It would be much preferable to kick off all the resets and then
> > wait for them to occur. You could probably do this by incrementing a
> > counter for each device you reset and decrementing it each time a watch
> > triggers then wait for the counter to hit zero.
> 
> That feature needs more thought. Since xenbus_reset_state() is only
> executed in the kexec/kdump case, the average use case is not slowed
> down.

I was thinking more of avoiding slowing down the kexec/kdump case
unnecessarily.

Ian.
> 
> Olaf


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ