[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110809135050.79eed316@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Date: Tue, 9 Aug 2011 13:50:50 +0100
From: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@....EDU>
Cc: x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>,
Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] Forcibly enable some MISC_ENABLE features on
Intel
On Tue, 9 Aug 2011 08:41:04 -0400
Andy Lutomirski <luto@....EDU> wrote:
> Intel allows BIOS or the OS to enable or disable some CPU fueatures via
> IA32_MISC_ENABLE. I have machines that don't enable fast strings or
> monitor/mwait in BIOS, so do it on bootup instead.
The question is - why.
> The Intel SDM volume 3, appendix B.1 says that the OS should not touch
> the monitor enable bit if SSE3 is not present, which presumably means
> that the OS may touch that bit if SSE3 is present. In any case, these
> patches seem to work.
That's a big "presumes"
For example back in Pentium days the BIOS sometimes turned off a string
fast path because it was subtly not reliable on certain parts and could
corrupt.
It's possible your BIOS vendor has a good reason for doing this. It's
also possible its a bug, or a left over perhaps from some pre-release
processor or something.
I think a bit more research is probably appropriate before processor
configuration hacks go in that 'seem to work'.
Alan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists