[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110809143509.GA10411@becoht-mvanga>
Date: Tue, 9 Aug 2011 16:35:09 +0200
From: Manohar Vanga <manohar.vanga@...n.ch>
To: Martyn Welch <martyn.welch@...com>
CC: "Emilio G. Cota" <cota@...ap.org>, <gregkh@...e.de>,
<devel@...verdev.osuosl.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/8] staging: vme: add functions for bridge module
refcounting
Hey Martyn,
> > I am not really an expert in these matters but would something like a sysfs file
> > be a cleaner approach to providing information on allocated resources within the
> > driver?
>
> That would probably be a better idea.
Great! We'll add a sysfs file for this :)
> > int ret = 0;
> > ...
> > vme_bridge_get(bridge);
> > if (driver->probe)
> > ret = driver->probe(vdev);
> > if (ret)
> > vme_bridge_put(bridge);
> > return ret;
>
> After looking at the PCI and RapidIO subsystems, I think this is probably the
> correct approach. I guess the only quiestion then is at which point is
> vme_bridge_put() called assuming the probe is successful. I guess at module
> unload time, though I haven't checked in the PCI and RapidIO code.
vme_bus_remove()? If it's incorrect, we can always change this later.
If we are agreed on this, let me know and I will make the changes and
resend the patches today.
> (Thank you for your patience)
(no problem)!
Thanks!
--
/manohar
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists