[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110809155014.GA4237@dumpdata.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Aug 2011 11:50:14 -0400
From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>
To: Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@...citrix.com>
Cc: Stefano Stabellini <Stefano.Stabellini@...citrix.com>,
"xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com" <xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com>,
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <Jeremy.Fitzhardinge@...rix.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xen: modify kernel mappings corresponding to granted
pages
> > So I hadn't looked at this in detail, but I wonder if we can use the
> > MULTIcall for this? It looks like we need to do two hypercalls so why
> > not batch it?
>
> That was going to be my next question. We should definitely batch these
> if possible.
>
> > And while we are it - we could change the MMU ops to only do this on
> > initial domain and for the domU case do the old mechanism?
>
> We need this in domU for driver domains and the like, don't we?
Sure, but I believe the majority of domU domains would not require this.
I was thinking that when we start playing with the device/driver domains
we would want to escalate the privilige level (or perhaps not)? Or
perhaps introcuce a new type - "if (xen_driver_domain())" to recognize
that we are special ?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists