[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CADU53JVXiX2v+5N-VP8mz6vnxF60BYYXKV_PZQdd_U+qM5Gd6A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Aug 2011 09:56:01 -0700
From: Ray Lee <ray-lk@...rabbit.org>
To: Kirill Smelkov <kirr@....spb.ru>
Cc: Vasily Khoruzhick <anarsoul@...il.com>,
intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org, Keith Packard <keithp@...thp.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
Luke-Jr <luke@...hjr.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] Major 2.6.38 / 2.6.39 / 3.0 regression ignored?
On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 9:32 AM, Kirill Smelkov <kirr@....spb.ru> wrote:
> Quite frankly, I don't understand intel-gfx developers attitude: why is
> it me, just random user who is nitpicking here? Why there is no
> interest/will to analyze now obviously buggy/duplicate code and fix it?
Because they don't have an infinite amount of manpower. Actual bugs
hitting actual users take precedence over 'cleanups' which always have
a chance of causing regressions, as you're well aware. Code churn for
the sake of abstract prettiness is discouraged, as it has a potential
cost for little potential gain.
If you like, submit a patch. You may now be more up-to-date on those
particular code paths than most of the intel-gfx developers.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists