lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Tue, 9 Aug 2011 13:52:33 -0500
From:	"Bob Pearson" <rpearson@...temfabricworks.com>
To:	"'Joakim Tjernlund'" <joakim.tjernlund@...nsmode.se>,
	"'George Spelvin'" <linux@...izon.com>
Cc:	<akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, <fzago@...temfabricworks.com>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <rdunlap@...otime.net>
Subject: RE: [patch v4 1/7] crc32: move-to-documentation.diff



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Joakim Tjernlund [mailto:joakim.tjernlund@...nsmode.se]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 09, 2011 11:50 AM
> To: George Spelvin
> Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org; fzago@...temfabricworks.com; linux-
> kernel@...r.kernel.org; rdunlap@...otime.net;
> rpearson@...temfabricworks.com
> Subject: Re: [patch v4 1/7] crc32: move-to-documentation.diff
> 
> "George Spelvin" <linux@...izon.com> wrote on 2011/08/09 13:45:04:
> >
> > Here's a hopefully-improved Documentation file, which explains the
slicing
> > algorithm as well.  As long as you have a big diff, it seems worth
tweaking.
> >
> > You also might want to leave a pointer in lib/crc32.c to the relocated
docs.
> >
> > (I'm just inclding the whole changed file because I assume it's easier
> > to review that way; do you prefer a diff?)
> 
> Nice, reading this once again I think I found an old typo. See below
> 
> Perhaps Bob can add this addition to his patch series?
> 
> >
> > === Cut here ===
> ...
> > Or in little-endian:
> > for (i = 0; i < input_bytes; i++) {
> >    remainder ^= next_input_byte();
> >    for (j = 0; j < 8; j++) {
> >       multiple = (remainder & 1) ? CRCPOLY : 0;
> >       remainder = (remainder << 1) ^ multiple;
> 
> Should not above line be:
>        remainder = (remainder >> 1) ^ multiple;

I agree. Will change in text.

> ?
> 
> >    }
> > }
> >
> > If the input is a multiple of 32 bits, you can even XOR in a 32-bit
> > word at a time and increase the inner loop count to 32.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ