linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5] ARM: Use generic BUG() handler

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4E41B19C.3040209@codeaurora.org>
Date:	Tue, 09 Aug 2011 15:15:56 -0700
From:	Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
To:	Simon Glass <sjg@...omium.org>
CC:	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@...aro.org>,
	Simon Glass <sjg@...gle.com>,
	Omar Ramirez Luna <omar.ramirez@...com>,
	Phil Carmody <ext-phil.2.carmody@...ia.com>,
	Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	Dave Martin <dave.martin@...aro.org>,
	Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Rabin Vincent <rabin@....in>,
	Alexander Shishkin <virtuoso@...nd.org>,
	Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
	Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] ARM: Use generic BUG() handler

On 07/29/2011 12:56 AM, Simon Glass wrote:
> From: Simon Glass <sjg@...gle.com>
>
> ARM uses its own BUG() handler which makes its output slightly different
> from other archtectures.
>
> One of the problems is that the ARM implementation doesn't report the function
> with the BUG() in it, but always reports the PC being in __bug(). The generic
> implementation doesn't have this problem.
>
> Currently we get something like:
>
> kernel BUG at fs/proc/breakme.c:35!
> Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 00000000
> ...
> PC is at __bug+0x20/0x2c
>
> With this patch it displays:
>
> kernel BUG at fs/proc/breakme.c:35!
> Internal error: Oops - undefined instruction: 0 [#1] PREEMPT SMP
> ...
> PC is at write_breakme+0xd0/0x1b4
>
> This implementation uses an undefined instruction to implement BUG, and sets up
> a bug table containing the relevant information. Many versions of gcc do not
> support %c properly for ARM (inserting a # when they shouldn't) so we work
> around this using distasteful macro magic.
>
> v1: Initial version to replace existing ARM BUG() implementation with something
> more similar to other architectures.
>
> v2: Add Thumb support, remove backtrace whitespace output changes. Change to
> use macros instead of requiring the asm %d flag to work (thanks to
> Dave Martin <dave.martin@...aro.org>)
>
> v3: Remove old BUG() implementation in favor of this one.
> Remove the Backtrace: message (will submit this separately).
> Use ARM_EXIT_KEEP() so that some architectures can dump exit text at link time
> thanks to Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org> (although since we always
> define GENERIC_BUG this might be academic.)
> Rebase to linux-2.6.git master.
>
> v4: Allow BUGS in modules (these were not reported correctly in v3)
> (thanks to Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org> for suggesting that.)
> Remove __bug() as this is no longer needed.
>
> v5: Add %progbits as the section flags.

Tested-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>

> Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@...omium.org>
> ---
>

Can you update the patch in the patch tracker? It would be great to see
this in the next merge window.

-- 
Sent by an employee of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/