[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+55aFyV65BNjdsmS9oTaRwWzyJZS3BDEDJBx5Poy-vGp5iN_Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Aug 2011 15:36:06 -0700
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Andrew Lutomirski <luto@....edu>
Cc: Greg Lueck <lueckintel@...oo.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"kimwooyoung@...il.com" <kimwooyoung@...il.com>
Subject: Re: New vsyscall emulation breaks JITs
On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 2:04 PM, Andrew Lutomirski <luto@....edu> wrote:
>
> Here's a different proposal, then:
>
> What if the kernel had the sequence:
>
> mov $__NR_whatever,%eax
> syscall
> ret
>
> in the vsyscall page but marked the vsyscall page NX.
This sounds like a sound idea. And then the difference between "fast
and native" and "slow and trapping" ends up literally being just the
NX bit.
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists