linux-kernel - Re: [Intel-gfx] Major 2.6.38 / 2.6.39 / 3.0 regression ignored?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20110810113728.GA7184@tugrik.mns.mnsspb.ru>
Date:	Wed, 10 Aug 2011 15:37:28 +0400
From:	Kirill Smelkov <kirr@....spb.ru>
To:	Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc:	Ray Lee <ray-lk@...rabbit.org>, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
	Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.hengli.com.au>,
	Luke-Jr <luke@...hjr.org>, intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
	Vasily Khoruzhick <anarsoul@...il.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] Major 2.6.38 / 2.6.39 / 3.0 regression ignored?

On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 10:41:44AM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
> > Sorry, I won't submit a patch. If there is a need to find/fix/cleanup
> > obvious things after company's developers, I have better things to do,
> > and a todo item to re-evaluate hardware for my next project.
> 
> You seem confused. If you have a support contract of some form with a
> Linux supplier or Intel please contact your support. This mailing list
> isn't for support services.

Thanks for clarifying.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/