[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110810181854.GD3396@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2011 14:18:54 -0400
From: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>
To: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@...el.com>
Cc: "linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>,
Greg Thelen <gthelen@...gle.com>,
Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@...il.com>,
Andrea Righi <arighi@...eler.com>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] writeback: per task dirty rate limit
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 11:29:54AM +0800, Wu Fengguang wrote:
[..]
> > > - ratelimit = ratelimit_pages;
> > > - if (mapping->backing_dev_info->dirty_exceeded)
> > > + ratelimit = current->nr_dirtied_pause;
> > > + if (bdi->dirty_exceeded)
> > > ratelimit = 8;
> >
> > Should we make sure that ratelimit is more than 8? It could be that
> > ratelimit is 1 and we set it higher (just reverse of what we wanted?)
>
> Good catch! I actually just fixed it in that direction :)
>
> if (bdi->dirty_exceeded)
> - ratelimit = 8;
> + ratelimit = min(ratelimit, 32 >> (PAGE_SHIFT - 10));
With page size 64K, will above lead to retelimit 0? Is that what you want.
I wouldn't think so.
Thanks
Vivek
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists