[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1313002838.18583.261.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2011 15:00:38 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Jason Baron <jbaron@...hat.com>
Cc: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, tglx@...utronix.de
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH][3.0] Tracepoint: dissociate from module mutex
On Wed, 2011-08-10 at 14:05 -0400, Jason Baron wrote:
> This is similar to the approach we have taken in the jump label code -
> on module insert/remove we store pointers into module table, so that we
> don't require the module_mutex during update time. It has been working
> well there, so this design makes sense to me at least.
It is also similar to what both ftrace and trace events do as well.
-- Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists