[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110810195854.GA5939@suse.de>
Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2011 12:58:54 -0700
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
To: "Mansoor, Illyas" <illyas.mansoor@...el.com>
Cc: "Liu, ShuoX" <shuox.liu@...el.com>,
"linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org"
<linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
"Brown, Len" <len.brown@...el.com>,
"Yanmin_zhang@...ux.intel.com" <Yanmin_zhang@...ux.intel.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [linux-pm] [PATCH v4] PM: add statistics debugfs file for
suspend to ram
On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 01:22:56AM +0530, Mansoor, Illyas wrote:
> static pm_message_t pm_transition;
> > > >
> > > > @@ -464,8 +465,12 @@ void dpm_resume_noirq(pm_message_t state)
> > > > mutex_unlock(&dpm_list_mtx);
> > > >
> > > > error = device_resume_noirq(dev, state);
> > > > - if (error)
> > > > + if (error) {
> > > > + suspend_stats.failed_resume_noirq++;
> > > > + dpm_save_failed_step(SUSPEND_RESUME_NOIRQ);
> > > > + dpm_save_failed_dev(dev_name(dev));
> > >
> > > Please make these statistics conditionally enabled, so on a production system
> > > If we need to disable these statistics code we should be able to do so.
> >
> > Why, are they taking time or space that is needed for something else?
> > What's the downside here of just not always having this enabled?
>
> Why have something that is not required/Used?
Because someone might need it and rebuilding a kernel isn't possible on
lots of devices.
> Its only useful if DEBUGFS is configured anyways
Almost all systems these days have debugfs enabled, so that's a moot
point.
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists