linux-kernel - RE: [linux-pm] [PATCH v4] PM: add statistics debugfs file for suspend to ram

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <EB6073F1DF78F9439DFDCC701BC6466007B36A0D19@bgsmsx502.gar.corp.intel.com>
Date:	Thu, 11 Aug 2011 01:55:47 +0530
From:	"Mansoor, Illyas" <illyas.mansoor@...el.com>
To:	"Mansoor, Illyas" <illyas.mansoor@...el.com>,
	Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
CC:	"Liu, ShuoX" <shuox.liu@...el.com>,
	"linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org" 
	<linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
	"Yanmin_zhang@...ux.intel.com" <Yanmin_zhang@...ux.intel.com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"Brown, Len" <len.brown@...el.com>
Subject: RE: [linux-pm] [PATCH v4] PM: add statistics debugfs file for
 suspend	to ram

> 
> > On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 01:22:56AM +0530, Mansoor, Illyas wrote:
> > > static pm_message_t pm_transition;
> > > > > >
> > > > > > @@ -464,8 +465,12 @@ void dpm_resume_noirq(pm_message_t state)
> > > > > >  		mutex_unlock(&dpm_list_mtx);
> > > > > >
> > > > > >  		error = device_resume_noirq(dev, state);
> > > > > > -		if (error)
> > > > > > +		if (error) {
> > > > > > +			suspend_stats.failed_resume_noirq++;
> > > > > > +			dpm_save_failed_step(SUSPEND_RESUME_NOIRQ);
> > > > > > +			dpm_save_failed_dev(dev_name(dev));
> > > > >
> > > > > Please make these statistics conditionally enabled, so on a production
> > system
> > > > > If we need to disable these statistics code we should be able to do so.
> > > >
> > > > Why, are they taking time or space that is needed for something else?
> > > > What's the downside here of just not always having this enabled?
> > >
> > > Why have something that is not required/Used?
> >
> > Because someone might need it and rebuilding a kernel isn't possible on
> > lots of devices.
> 
> Agreed.
> 
> >
> > > Its only useful if DEBUGFS is configured anyways
> >
> > Almost all systems these days have debugfs enabled, so that's a moot
> > point.
> 
> We could do the same for this as well, since DEBUGFS is still a compile time
> Option even thou many enable it by default we don't make it part of the kernel
> isn't it.
> 

May be it's not worth debating on this one, I'm okay if it's part of the kernel as well.

-Illyas
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/