linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2 RESEND] regulator: aat2870: Fix the logic of checking if no id is matched in aat2870_get

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4E42F8AD.5050000@ti.com>
Date:	Wed, 10 Aug 2011 22:31:25 +0100
From:	Liam Girdwood <lrg@...com>
To:	"axel.lin@...il.com" <axel.lin@...il.com>
CC:	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Jin Park <jinyoungp@...dia.com>,
	Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
	Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2 RESEND] regulator: aat2870: Fix the logic of checking
 if no id is matched in aat2870_get_regulator

On 10/08/11 16:19, Axel Lin wrote:
> 2011/7/30 Liam Girdwood <lrg@...com>:
>> On Fri, 2011-07-29 at 18:05 +0200, Axel Lin wrote:
>>> hi,
>>> Seems this 2 patches are not upstream. Should I resend it again?
>>> Regards,
>>> Axel
>>
>> Not required atm thanks, this driver went via mfd so I can apply the fix
>> after the mfd merge or rc1.
> hi Liam,
> aat2870-regulator.c is already merged to your tree but
> seems these 2 patches are not (yet) upstream.
> 

Could you check regulator git #for-linus. I applied a bunch of patches a few days ago and some for this device. I'll do a pull request for rc2 in a few days.

Thanks

Liam 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/