[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110810040445.GM2203@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2011 05:04:45 +0100
From: Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
To: richard -rw- weinberger <richard.weinberger@...il.com>
Cc: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
Arnaud Lacombe <lacombar@...il.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org,
user-mode-linux-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] um: Use __i386__ in ifdef for vsyscall exports, not
SUBARCH_i386
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 12:38:17AM +0100, Al Viro wrote:
> * tty-on-xterm sometimes crashes on the first keysyms reaching it;
> as far as I can tell, it's something related to SIGWINCH handling - whether
> it happens or not depends on the way xterm windows are laid out and flipping
> between them first seems to prevent that shit. If it hasn't happened at once,
> it won't happen at all... Something in drivers/chan or drivers/line, most
> likely...
FWIW, what I'm seeing there is chan_interrupt() with tty that has definitely
been kfree'd. What happens is that we have several opened files for
given tty and they all get closed in parallel. Now, ->release() of
tty calls ->close() of driver (line_close() in this case) and then
gets around to decrementing tty->count. As the result, *all* callers
of line_close() see line->tty->count > 1 and leave line->tty not reset to
NULL. Oops...
Moral: do not use the counters on upper layer objects unless you know
what you are doing *and* know what will happen to that upper layer in
years to come...
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists