linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH, RFC] USBIP protocol documentation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAL-cBk3vD7qiwmxjO83SXDCWwSCX8L2hmKetJT-gx1nZbq=mkg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 10 Aug 2011 14:41:14 +0800
From:	David Chang <dchang@...e.com>
To:	Németh Márton <nm127@...email.hu>
Cc:	Matthew Wilcox <matthew@....cx>, Max Vozeler <max@...eler.com>,
	Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
	usbip-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>,
	Matt Mooney <mfm@...eddisk.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH, RFC] USBIP protocol documentation

Hi Németh,

2011/8/9 Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>:
> On Tue, Aug 09, 2011 at 05:23:14PM +0800, David Chang wrote:
>> Hi Greg,
>>
>> Sorry, just one question about the usbip protocol document.
>> I would like to know why didn't you apply this patch.
>
> Because it was sent as a "RFC" (i.e. request for comments) and based on
> the discussion afterward, there were lots of comments :)
>
> If someone wants to resend it to me, without that marking, I'll be glad
> to apply it.
>

Could you resend the protocol document patch again without the RFC marking?
And then we can get an initial version of the USBIP document.
Thanks!

Best Regards,
David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/