[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20110811181804.44f2ee80.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2011 18:18:04 +0900
From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
To: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>
Cc: Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
XFS <xfs@....sgi.com>, Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Johannes Weiner <jweiner@...hat.com>,
Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@...el.com>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/7] mm: vmscan: Throttle reclaim if encountering too
many dirty pages under writeback
On Wed, 10 Aug 2011 11:47:19 +0100
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de> wrote:
> Workloads that are allocating frequently and writing files place a
> large number of dirty pages on the LRU. With use-once logic, it is
> possible for them to reach the end of the LRU quickly requiring the
> reclaimer to scan more to find clean pages. Ordinarily, processes that
> are dirtying memory will get throttled by dirty balancing but this
> is a global heuristic and does not take into account that LRUs are
> maintained on a per-zone basis. This can lead to a situation whereby
> reclaim is scanning heavily, skipping over a large number of pages
> under writeback and recycling them around the LRU consuming CPU.
>
> This patch checks how many of the number of pages isolated from the
> LRU were dirty and under writeback. If a percentage of them under
> writeback, the process will be throttled if a backing device or the
> zone is congested. Note that this applies whether it is anonymous or
> file-backed pages that are under writeback meaning that swapping is
> potentially throttled. This is intentional due to the fact if the
> swap device is congested, scanning more pages and dispatching more
> IO is not going to help matters.
>
> The percentage that must be in writeback depends on the priority. At
> default priority, all of them must be dirty. At DEF_PRIORITY-1, 50%
> of them must be, DEF_PRIORITY-2, 25% etc. i.e. as pressure increases
> the greater the likelihood the process will get throttled to allow
> the flusher threads to make some progress.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>
> Reviewed-by: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@...il.com>
> Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <jweiner@...hat.com>
Reviewed-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
Maybe I need to add memcg_is_congested() ...
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists