[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110811131610.GA21916@ucw.cz>
Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2011 15:16:10 +0200
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@....EDU>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, lueckintel@...oo.com,
kimwooyoung@...il.com, Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC v2] x86-64: Allow emulated vsyscalls from user addresses
Hi!
> They trace control flow through the vsyscall page and recompile that
> code somewhere else. Then they expect it to work. DynamoRIO
> (http://dynamorio.org/) and Pin (http://www.pintool.org/) are
> affected. They crash when tracing programs that use vsyscalls.
> Valgrind is smart enough not to cause problems. It crashes on the
> getcpu vsyscall, but that has nothing to do with emulation.
>
> This patch makes each of the three vsyscall entries use a different
> vector so that they can work when relocated. It assumes that the
> code that relocates them is okay with the int instruction acting
> like ret. DynamoRIO at least appears to work.
int acting as ret is seriously weird semantics. And no, invalid
syscall parameters will not cause segfault, just return of -EFAULT. So
... can this be changed?
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists