lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1313071035-12047-9-git-send-email-matt@console-pimps.org>
Date:	Thu, 11 Aug 2011 14:56:42 +0100
From:	Matt Fleming <matt@...sole-pimps.org>
To:	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Yoshinori Sato <ysato@...rs.sourceforge.jp>
Subject: [PATCH 08/41] h8300: Use set_current_blocked()

From: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@...el.com>

As described in e6fa16ab ("signal: sigprocmask() should do
retarget_shared_pending()") the modification of current->blocked is
incorrect as we need to check whether the signal we're about to block
is pending in the shared queue.

Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Cc: Yoshinori Sato <ysato@...rs.sourceforge.jp>
Signed-off-by: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@...el.com>
---
 arch/h8300/kernel/signal.c |   36 +++++++++++++-----------------------
 1 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/h8300/kernel/signal.c b/arch/h8300/kernel/signal.c
index af842c3..4c06f98 100644
--- a/arch/h8300/kernel/signal.c
+++ b/arch/h8300/kernel/signal.c
@@ -57,14 +57,13 @@ asmlinkage int do_signal(struct pt_regs *regs, sigset_t *oldset);
 asmlinkage int do_sigsuspend(struct pt_regs *regs)
 {
 	old_sigset_t mask = regs->er3;
-	sigset_t saveset;
+	sigset_t saveset, blocked;
 
-	mask &= _BLOCKABLE;
-	spin_lock_irq(&current->sighand->siglock);
 	saveset = current->blocked;
-	siginitset(&current->blocked, mask);
-	recalc_sigpending();
-	spin_unlock_irq(&current->sighand->siglock);
+
+	mask &= _BLOCKABLE;
+	siginitset(&blocked, mask);
+	set_current_blocked(&blocked);
 
 	regs->er0 = -EINTR;
 	while (1) {
@@ -90,11 +89,8 @@ do_rt_sigsuspend(struct pt_regs *regs)
 		return -EFAULT;
 	sigdelsetmask(&newset, ~_BLOCKABLE);
 
-	spin_lock_irq(&current->sighand->siglock);
 	saveset = current->blocked;
-	current->blocked = newset;
-	recalc_sigpending();
-	spin_unlock_irq(&current->sighand->siglock);
+	set_current_blocked(&newset);
 
 	regs->er0 = -EINTR;
 	while (1) {
@@ -232,10 +228,7 @@ asmlinkage int do_sigreturn(unsigned long __unused,...)
 		goto badframe;
 
 	sigdelsetmask(&set, ~_BLOCKABLE);
-	spin_lock_irq(&current->sighand->siglock);
-	current->blocked = set;
-	recalc_sigpending();
-	spin_unlock_irq(&current->sighand->siglock);
+	set_current_blocked(&set);
 	
 	if (restore_sigcontext(regs, &frame->sc, &er0))
 		goto badframe;
@@ -260,10 +253,7 @@ asmlinkage int do_rt_sigreturn(unsigned long __unused,...)
 		goto badframe;
 
 	sigdelsetmask(&set, ~_BLOCKABLE);
-	spin_unlock_irq(&current->sighand->siglock);
-	current->blocked = set;
-	recalc_sigpending();
-	spin_lock_irq(&current->sighand->siglock);
+	set_current_blocked(&set);
 	
 	if (restore_sigcontext(regs, &frame->uc.uc_mcontext, &er0))
 		goto badframe;
@@ -463,6 +453,8 @@ static void
 handle_signal(unsigned long sig, siginfo_t *info, struct k_sigaction *ka,
 	      sigset_t *oldset,	struct pt_regs * regs)
 {
+	sigset_t blocked;
+
 	/* are we from a system call? */
 	if (regs->orig_er0 >= 0) {
 		switch (regs->er0) {
@@ -489,12 +481,10 @@ handle_signal(unsigned long sig, siginfo_t *info, struct k_sigaction *ka,
 	else
 		setup_frame(sig, ka, oldset, regs);
 
-	spin_lock_irq(&current->sighand->siglock);
-	sigorsets(&current->blocked,&current->blocked,&ka->sa.sa_mask);
+	sigorsets(&blocked, &current->blocked, &ka->sa.sa_mask);
 	if (!(ka->sa.sa_flags & SA_NODEFER))
-		sigaddset(&current->blocked,sig);
-	recalc_sigpending();
-	spin_unlock_irq(&current->sighand->siglock);
+		sigaddset(&blocked, sig);
+	set_current_blocked(&blocked);
 }
 
 /*
-- 
1.7.4.4

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ